Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as Social Legitimacy Management

This chapter defines corporate social responsibility (CSR) as the managing of social legitimacy, with basis in a normative social contract theory of the relationship between business and society. The chapter is a conceptual exploration of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and legitimacy, and argues (1) that the broad conception of the social role of corporations has changed as a consequence – or as part – of the emergence of a global, free market and (2) that this political and economic development may be conceptualized in terms of a redistribution of responsibility. However, this redistribution need not be understood as a development towards increasing political legitimacy for corporations, which would entail a fundamental challenge to democratic ideals. Rather, it makes sense to view it in light of an ethics of responsibility whereby, e.g., ecological problems must be addressed in terms of collective responsibility and collective agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Similar content being viewed by others

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as Social Legitimacy Management

Chapter © 2020

The Corporate Legitimacy Matrix – A Framework to Analyze Complex Business-Society Relations

Article 12 September 2018

The Concept of Business Legitimacy: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship, Corporate Governance as Essential Elements of Ethical Business Legitimacy

Chapter © 2019

References

• Apel KO (1997) Diskurs und Verantwortung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main Google Scholar
• Beck U, Holzer B (2007) Organizations in world risk society. In: Pearson C, Roux-Dufort C, Clair J (eds). International handbook of organizational crisis management. Sage, London, 3–24 Google Scholar
• Carson SG (2015) Bedrifters politiske ansvar [The political responsibility of corporations]. Magma 6:22–29 Google Scholar
• Carson SG, Hagen Ø, Sethi SP (2015) From implicit to explicit CSR in a Scandinavian context: the cases of HÅG and Hydro. J Bus Ethics 127(1):17–31 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Carson SG (2016) Political CSR and the colonization of the lifeworld. In: Mikalsen KK, Skjei E, Øfsti A (eds) Modernity – unity in diversity? Essays in honour of Helge Høibraaten. Novus, Oslo, pp 283–308 Google Scholar
• Carson SG (2019) The corporate legitimacy matrix – a framework to analyze complex business-society relations. Philos Manag 18(2):169–187 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Carson SG, Skauge T (2019) Etikk for beslutningstakere – virksomheters bærekraft og samfunnsansvar [Ethics for decision makers – the sustainability and social responsibility of business]. Cappelen Damm akademisk, Oslo Google Scholar
• Deegan C, Rankin M, Tobin J (2002) An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: a test of legitimacy theory. Account Audit Account J 15(3):312–343 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson T (1982) Corporations and morality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1994) Toward a unified conception of business ethics: integrative social contracts theory. Acad Manag Rev 19:252–284 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Dunfee T W (2000) Precis for ties that bind. Business and Society Review 105(4):436 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (2002) Ties that bind in business ethics: social contracts and why they matter. J Bank Financ 26:1853–1865 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20:65–91 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociol Rev 18(1):122–136 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Freeman ER (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston Google Scholar
• Jonas H (1979) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die Technologische Zivilisation. Insel Verlag, Franfurt am Main Google Scholar
• Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30:166–179 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33:404–424 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Peter F (2017) Political legitimacy. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Summer 2017 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds) (2012) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2008) Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Siegel, pp. 413–431 Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J Manag Stud 48:899–931 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Shocker AD, Sethi SP (1973) An approach to developing societal preferences in developing corporate action strategies. Calif Manag Rev 15:97–105 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Vogel D (2010) The private regulation of global corporate conduct: achievements and limitations. Bus Soc 49:68–87 ArticleGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. NTNU, Trondheim, Norway Siri Granum Carson

1. Siri Granum Carson